As an airplane owner, I am often asked if an airplane can be a moneymaker. The question usually arrives as an assumed positive, as in, "Wow, you rent out your airplane... that's gotta be a moneymaker!" As with most things, reality may not always match expectations.
To illustrate, here is a recap of the "numbers" from last year for my favorite little airplane, my Aeroprakt A32 Vixxen. She's a beautiful 2-seat, 100 MPH, flyer with jaw-dropping visibility from her large glass door windows. She's the perfect low and slow or fast and fun airplane, a capable long-flyer and a near-perfect airplane for training.
However, my accountant will rather sourly point out that while last year's rental of the Vixxen brought in $14.3k on the revenue side of the ledger, the expenses tallied $21.3k on the other side meaning my "moneymaker" generated a not insignificant $7k loss instead of the hoped for profit.
On the revenue side, in 2021, the Vixxen rented out for 168 hours, plus I flew her for 16 more hours (mostly to and from scheduled and sometimes unscheduled maintenance) for a total of 184 hours. So the rental hours alone produced an average $85 per flight hour in revenue. Don't get me wrong, there were also plenty of smiles generated throughout those hours and with 168 rental hours, lots of other people also got to enjoy the Vixxen, but it wasn't a "big moneymaker" by any stretch.
Well, over the course of the year, there's insurance, hangar, and maintenance expenses, let alone gas and such.
Thus, total expenses tallied $21.3k.
Here's the view on a per flight-hour cost:
All of the above means that every flight hour in 2021 cost $116 per hour versus revenue of just $85 per hour. Enough said?
Note that the published rental rate for the Vixxen in 2021 was $110 per hour. However, to help ensure we had enough CFI's ready to train in the Vixxen, I offered CFI's a lower rate to help them through the insurance qualifications so they could provide training to others in the Vixxen and be properly insured.
At first glance, you might just say, "raise your rental rate and all will be good." I worry though that raising the rate may make it harder for some wanna-be flyers to afford the sport, and it may leave those who do fly, flying less hours so as to hold down their cost.
However, if you're an accountant, you've likely already cut to the chase and recognized that the two largest categories of expenses (insurance and hangar fees - plus the property tax costs) are "fixed" costs. As such, they stay the same, in total, regardless of how many hours the plane does or does not fly. That means if you double the number of hours flown, those costs will drop in half on a per hour basis.
To me, it seems pretty clear, the answer to getting the Vixxen to being a positive moneymaker versus it's current loss-maker status, is simple... get more rental hours of flight, plus a tiny rate bump to $120 per hour given the increasing fuel costs already seen in 2022 and voila, a small profit!
Yes, the answer means "simply" introducing more and more people to the thrill of flying in a small airplane through some of the prettiest scenery Southern California has to offer. How hard can that be?
Who do you know who wants to fly for fun with us?
PS you'll note that the actual cost of purchasing an airplane is not addressed at all in the above numbers ... that's an exploration for another time.